Missile Guidance System

To date there have been a total of 4 variations in the Missile Guidance System that has been used for the Minuteman missile.

Starting with the Minuteman I, the NS-10Q Missile Guidance System was installed with each missile, which relied upon the Autonetics D-17B computer as a part of its guidance system.

The Minuteman II missile was upgraded with the NS-17 Missile Guidance System, which incorporated the Autonetics D-37C computer.

In introducing the Minuteman III missile, which had the capacity of 3 Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry vehicles, (MIRV) the new NS-20 Missile Guidance System was deployed, and relied on the Autonetics D-37D computer for its processing power

December 4, 2007 marked the date of the final installation of the NS-50 Missile Guidance System, MGS, at Malmstrom AFB in Great Falls, Montana. This final MGS installation saw to completion all three missile wings being upgraded to the new NS-50 guidance system. Boeing had previously purchased the Autonetics company, and Boeing was responsible for the production of this latest missile guidance system.

Autonetics D17B Guidance Computer

Autonetics D-17B Guidance Computer

Click on the image for a larger view

Autonetics D-17B Missile Guidance System Computer

For the Minuteman I missile, the complete Missile Guidance System consisted of a D-17B computer, power supplies and a stable platform. The D-17B computer housed 6282 diodes, 1521 transistors, 1116 capacitors and 504 resistors. Fully assembled the guidance system weighed approximately 62 pounds.

Each of these individual components were mounted on double copper clad, gold plated, glass fiber laminate circuit boards. A total of 75 of these circuit boards make up the D-17B computer, and each was coated with a flexible polyurethane compound designed for protection from moisture and vibration. This weapon system had an extreme demand for reliability and ruggedness.

In the image above, in the lower right quadrant, is the disk memory that housed a 6000 rpm magnetic disk used with the D-17B. It had a capacity of storing 5454 words. For the individual who is moderately to advanced in computer literacy, Wikipedia discusses the D-17B and its components in much greater detail. Autonetics was the associate contractor for the Minuteman guidance system, which included both the prelaunch and flight software.

The targeting information that was uploaded in to the D-17B, used special mylar/paper tape loaded with the targeting information on the tape. The targeting coordinates was performed at Strategic Air Command Headquarters by the Operational Targeting Program that was developed by TRW to execute on an IBM 709 mainframe computer.

Autonetics D-37C Missile Guidance System Computer

Autonetics D-37C Guidance Computer

Autonetics D-37C Guidance Computer

Once the Minuteman II missile entered into production, its Missile Guidance System consisted of the Autonetics D-37C computer. The Minuteman II missile relied on the NS-17 Missile Guidance Set to navigate its warhead to its target. This system was designed around an all-inertial system that could store multiple preprogrammed targets in its internal memory.

Inertial guidance systems do not rely on observations of positions of the stars or land positions, nor does it rely on radio or radar signals. Essentially this system does not rely on any information from outside the missile. The inertial navigator that is designed into the NS-17 Missile Guidance Set provides the guidance information using gyroscopes that indicate direction, as well as accelerometers that measure changes in the speed and direction of the missile.

The D-37C computer then compiles this information to calculate the missiles' current position and makes adjustments in guiding the missile on its course. Given that all of the information needed to "steer" the missile to its intended target was based on components built into the missile, enemies would not be able to introduce to the guidance system false or confusing information.

This Autonetics computer consisted of four main sections. The memory, the central processing unit (CPU), and the input and output units. The memory contained a two sided fixed head magnetic disk which rotates at 6000 rpm. Its storage capacity could contain up to 7222 words.

The NS-17 Missile Guidance Set and D-37C computer had an added design that implemented a "code inserter verifier" that was used at the Wing headquarters to generate the targeting codes that would be uploaded to the D-37C computer. The Air Force required not only that the flight program software was correct, but that there was no additional code that could lead to an unauthorized or accidental launch.

As was used with the D-17B computer, TRW continued its role in compiling the targeting information for the Minuteman missile, which was first referred to as independent verification and validation, and would later be designated as Nuclear Safety Cross Check Analysis, (NRSCCA). Logicon RDA was then selected to perform the NSCCA of the targeting and execution plan software programs developed by TRW.

Autonetics D-37D Missile Guidance System Computer

Autonetics D-37D Guidance Computer

Autonetics D-37D Guidance Computer

Click on the image for a larger view

The NS-20 was the name of the first Minuteman III Missile Guidance System, MGS. The purpose of the NS-20 MGS is to perform ground and in-flight functions for the Minuteman III weapon system. This system consists of the Autonetics D-37D computer, a unit designed for inertial measurement, cabling, coolant hoses and other hardware.

While in the Launch Facility, the Missile Guidance System continually communicates to the ground system within the LF, and responds to commands received from the ground system, and constantly monitors and reports on the health of the missile system.

Autonetics D-37D Gyro

Autonetics D-37D Gyro

Click on the image for a larger view

The Minuteman missiles has three solid fuel rocket boosters, each designed for the various stages of flight, from launch, mid flight and the third and final stage of flight, before the payload bus, which contains the Missile Guidance System and Post Boost Propulsion System, separates from the third booster. At the initiation of launch and into the first stage of flight, the Missile Guidance System flight computer sends commands to the nozzle control unit to keep the missile on the exact course required for the reentry vehicles to reach their specific targets.

With each of the three stages of rocket boosters, the D-37D flight computer has the ability to sense when the rocket booster is nearly depleted of fuel, at which point it sends a command to separate that nearly spent booster, and ignite the next stage booster. The inertial guidance system then sends signals to the flight computer, which then sends commands to the Thrust Vector Control (TVC) Unit, on each of the succeeding solid rocket boosters, insuring that the missile remains on course.

For further discussion and more detailed information on the Payload Bus, also referred to as the Post Boost Propulsion System, follow the link below

NS-50 Missile Guidance System

NS-50 Missile Guidance System - Malmstrom AFB

Click on the image for a larger view

The NS-50 Missile Guidance System (sometimes referred to as the Missile Guidance Set) is the result of the Minuteman III Guidance Replacement Program, GRP, which came about after a five year engineering and manufacturing development program (EMD). The Air Force established this program in order to extend the service life of the Missile Guidance System beyond the year 2020.

Back in 1996 a number of critical design reviews were established, to identify design weaknesses in the MGS - the NS-20 Missile Guidance Set/System. As a result, a more robust, less vulnerable system was created, allowing for a consistently more accurate Missile Guidance System, that also requires less maintenance over time. Less maintenance means less operational cost.

In September 1998 the Guidance Replacement Program was able to successfully perform a second flight test of the GRP from Vandenberg, AFB in California. After a total of seven flight tests, the Air Force determined that the accuracy results were not within specifications. They were able to determine that this was being caused by two primary sources of errors in the guidance system software.

Moving forward, full capacity of production of the NS-50 MGS started in early 2000. Boeing was awarded the contract for production, which oversaw a total of 652 Missile Guidance Systems being built to support the 500 operational Minuteman III missiles that were deployed at the time. The final MGS was installed December 4, 2007, on a Minuteman III missile at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Great Falls, Montana.

The image below provides a comparison between the older NS-20 Missile Guidance Set in relation to the latest NS-50 MGS. The NS-50 design is functionally similar to the NS-20.

Minuteman III Guidance System

Minuteman III Guidance System

Click on the image for a larger view

The NS-50 incorporates the Gyro Stabilized Platform, GSP, which functions as a means to measure the missile's acceleration, which then translates the acceleration into velocity. The missile's velocity is then combined with attitude information and this information is then processed by the guidance computer during flight. In reference to the term "attitude", this is essentially the direction and/or angle that the missile is heading. Without a precise attitude, the Minuteman missile will not be able to deliver its warhead/warheads accurately to its programmed target.

The Gyro Stabilized Platform was designed with an external gimbal configuration. The platform is stabilized (both prior to flight, as well as during flight) by two dual-axis, free rotor gyros that are supported on self generated gas bearings. One gyro functions as the pitch and roll axis stabilization reference. The second gyro functions as determining the azimuth stabilization reference.

A dual-axis gas bearing gyro was chosen due to it dynamic stability over extended periods of operation, as well as its ability to withstand high G loads, without impacting its ability to function with precision. The Guidance and Control system is designed as such, that the gyro rotors can self generate the gas necessary to provide a cushion in the gas insulated bearings. Given the high G forces impacting the missile as a whole upon launch, having bearings protected by a gas, provides not only the ability to perform its task with precision, but provides a significant reduction in the wear and tear on the gyros and their bearings.

The Gyro Stabilized Platform also integrates three Pendulous Integrating Gyroscopic Accelerometers, PIGAs, to measure the missile's acceleration along each of its three axes. Each of the three accelerometers have a gyroscopic pendulous mass contained in the device, which houses a gyroscopic pendulous mass which is floating in a liquid to minimize friction and bearing load. Sensors within the accelerometers measure the acceleration of the missile, based on the position of the pendulous mass, which then provides output information to the guidance and control computer based on measurements of the acceleration of the Minuteman missile.

The video below is a CGI depiction of a launch of a Minuteman III missile. The video shows how each stage of the 3 stages of the solid rocket boosters operate, culminating with the final release of Post Boost Propulsion System (payload bus) which then maneuvers the reentry vehicle to the desired point of release. The video is a helpful visual reference of how the Missile Guidance System described above, performs what it was designed to do, from launch to the release of the reentry vehicle.

This video was produced by Northrop Grumman, a major company that has been an integral partner with the Air Force for many years. Northrop Grumman has been supplying major components for the Minuteman missile weapons system for quite some time.

The video format is an mp4, which will require that your computer have the ability to play mp4 files. Windows Media Player version 12 will allow you to view this video. For those who aren't set up to play an mp4 video, one option suggested is using the Media Player Classic video player, a free program that works quite well. https://mpc-hc.org/

Peacekeeper Missile Guidance System

The Peacekeeper, LGM-118A missile used an entirely different Missile Guidance System for its Reentry vehicle delivery system. One of the key components of the Peacekeeper MGS is the Advanced Inertial Reference Sphere, AIRS. The information available on the AIRS states that it is the most accurate Inertial Navigation System, (INS), ever developed.

Advanced Inertial Reference Sphere

Advanced Inertial Reference Sphere

Photo Copyright - Martin Miller - www.martin-miller.us

The INS unit, which is extremely complex as well as being very expensive, possesses "third generation accuracy" as defined by Dr. Charles Stark Draper, who is the leading expert in the development of hyper-accurate inertial guidance. The Inertial Navigation System produces a remarkably low drift rate per hour of operation. This drift rate is so low that the Advanced Inertial Reference Sphere creates approximately 1 percent of the Peacekeeper missile's inaccuracy.

Based on these parameters the AIRS is essentially a perfect guidance system. In other words, if the AIRS performed with a zero percent drift rate, it would not measurably improve the Peacekeeper missile's accuracy. An extremely small amount of the AIRS precision is impacted during the flight of the missile, given that its primary function is simply to maintain guidance system alignment while on alert within the Launch Facility, without relying upon an external reference through its precision gyrocompassing.

Prior to the Peacekeeper missile, most Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles called upon an external alignment system to keep the Inertial Navigation System in synch prior to launch. The introduction of the AIRS eliminated the need for any type of external reference input. As a result, a significant increase in complexity and cost regarding the AIRS became a reality.

The AIRS has a total of 19,000 parts. It uses a total of 3 accelerometers. In 1989 one accelerometer cost $300,000 and necessitated 6 months to manufacture. Development for the Peacekeeper missile began in 1972. In 1975 the AIRS component was transferred from the Draper Laboratory to Northrop Electronics Division for advanced development. Extreme difficulty was experienced in transferring the hand built laboratory at Draper, to Northrop that was now working on the AIRS in a production environment.

Despite years of concentrated effort, by July 1987 Northrop Electronics Division managed only to complete the manufacture of a small number of the AIRS units. The United States Congress was most definitely not happy with the slow production of this promising new ICBM technology. The Peacekeeper (MX) missiles were being emplaced into Launch Facilities with no guidance system that would allow them to be launched, if needed. By December 1988 a total of 50 of the AIRS Inertial Navigation Systems were installed on all 50 Peacekeeper missiles.

Following the lengthy delay in the manufacture of the AIRS units and the final installation of the 50 AIRS needed for the MX missile, responsibility for the continued production of the INS was given to the Autonetics Division of Rockwell International. Rockwell was able to call upon technologies developed over 30 years on the INS developed by the Draper Laboratory, which had formerly been known as the Instrumentation Laboratory of MIT.

The most unique aspect of the AIRS is that it has no gimbals. Gimbals are pivots that are provided for each of the three spatial axes so that the guidance platform can move freely in all directions, which allows the guidance system to maintain its absolute alignment with the outside world.

The Advanced Inertial Reference Sphere houses three accelerometers and three gyroscopes. It is consists of a beryllium sphere that floats in a fluorocarbon fluid within an outer shell that makes it possible for this sphere to rotate in any direction. This feature eliminates the possibility of gimbal lock - where the axes of two gimbals line up and destroy the three dimensional freedom of motion - which allows the system to be free from arbitrary limits to range of motion found in some gimbal designs.